Roof insurance claims, from the homeowner’s side

What follows is how the process actually runs, in the order it runs in. It is not advice about your policy — nobody can give you that without reading it — and it is not a promise about any outcome. It is the map.

In Fountain Valley the failure that leads is salt reaching far enough inland to shorten the life of everything metal, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. Salt carries further inland than people assume. It shows up first as rust tracks on the vents and staining below the valley metal. Locally the claims that come up are wind and water rather than impact. The dated gust record for Fountain Valley is on the storm page, and it is the closest thing to a free piece of evidence a homeowner here has.

The sequence, start to finish

A roof claim has a fixed shape. Something happens; you document it; you stop it getting worse; you report it; an adjuster inspects and writes a scope and an estimate; the insurer issues a first payment; the work is done; and if the policy pays replacement cost, a second payment follows once you prove the work was completed. Most of the trouble homeowners run into comes from doing those steps out of order — most commonly from letting a contractor start before anything has been documented.

The single most expensive mistake is tidying up before photographing. Once the tarp is on and the debris is cleared, the evidence of what happened is gone, and what is left is your word against an estimate.

Evidence, before anything else

Take four times as many pictures as feel necessary and make sure the dates are intact — most phones record this automatically, and it is worth checking rather than assuming. Include something for scale in the close shots. Photograph the gutters, the vent caps and the downspouts as well as the roof itself, because soft metal records an impact more legibly than a shingle does.

Alongside the photographs, keep a plain written note of what happened and when: the date and rough time of the storm, when you first noticed the damage, who you called and what they said. A dated contemporaneous note is worth a great deal more than a recollection three months later.

The file, in practical terms:

• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired
• Interior photographs, including the attic and the underside of the deck
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to
• Your policy declarations page, showing the deductible and the settlement basis
• The contractor’s written assessment, if you have had one done
• Receipts for tarps, emergency call-outs and anything else spent making it safe

What an adjuster is actually looking for

An adjuster is not deciding whether your roof is old. They are deciding two things: whether the damage was caused by a peril the policy covers, and whether it happened during the policy period. Everything they do on the roof serves those two questions. They will look for a consistent pattern of damage on the slopes facing the weather, for damage to soft metal that corroborates the story, and for signs that the roof was already failing before the event.

The word that decides most claims is "sudden". Damage that is clearly the result of one event is covered; wear, deterioration, poor maintenance and long-term leaks generally are not, and are usually excluded in so many words.

Two settlement bases, and the difference is most of the cheque

Replacement cost, actual cash value, and recoverable depreciation are three terms worth learning before the first phone call. Replacement cost is today’s price for the work. Actual cash value is that price reduced for the years the roof has already served. Recoverable depreciation is the gap between them, which a replacement cost policy will pay once the work is done and documented, and which an actual cash value policy will not pay at all.

Some policies apply a different, harsher schedule to roofs specifically — a roof surfacing payment schedule, or a scheduled roof endorsement — which pays a declining percentage based on the roof’s age regardless of the rest of the policy. If your policy has one, it will be named on the declarations page, and it changes the arithmetic completely.

The line, and which side of it to stay on

Insurance fraud is not a technicality and it does not require anybody to feel like a criminal while doing it. Adding damage that was already there to a new claim, describing wear as storm damage, allowing an invoice to show a figure that was not actually paid, or accepting a waived deductible are all fraud, and all four are ordinary enough after a storm that homeowners agree to them without recognising what they are agreeing to.

The homeowner is a party to it, not a bystander. The contractor who suggested it will not be the one explaining it later.

The deductible, and the thing no honest contractor will offer

The deductible comes off every claim payment, and many policies carry a second, larger one that applies only to wind and hail. That one is often written as a percentage of the insured value of the house rather than as a flat sum, which means it can be several times the size of the ordinary deductible. On a house insured for four hundred thousand dollars, a two per cent wind-and-hail deductible is eight thousand dollars, and a great many homeowners discover this at the worst possible moment.

Check the declarations page for both figures before filing. If the likely damage is smaller than the applicable deductible, filing achieves nothing and still puts a claim on your record.

Why the argument is usually about how much of the roof

A partial approval is not a denial, and it is not final either. If your contractor’s scope and the adjuster’s scope differ, the route forward is a written, itemised comparison of the two — line by line, with photographs attached to the lines that differ — sent to the insurer with a request for re-inspection. Insurers revise scopes routinely when given something specific to revise against. They revise nothing in response to a phone call expressing dissatisfaction.

Ask the contractor for their scope in the same format the insurer uses, item by item with quantities. Two documents in the same shape can be compared. A quote that is one number and a paragraph cannot be.

Timelines, and the deadlines that bite

Two clocks run and only one of them is obvious. The visible one is how long the insurer takes: most states set regulatory deadlines for acknowledging a claim, for deciding it, and for paying once it is accepted, and these are usually counted in days rather than months. Your state insurance department publishes the actual numbers, and they are enforceable.

The other clock is yours, and it is the one that ends claims. Policies require prompt notice of a loss and set an outer limit on how long after the event you can report it. Damage discovered late — hail in particular, because it hides — is denied on this basis more often than on any question about the damage itself.

Worth knowing before you pick up the phone

A written contractor assessment before the adjuster’s visit gives you something to compare the adjuster’s scope against, which is the difference between a conversation and a disagreement. Most reputable local contractors will do this without charge, and it does not commit you to using them.

Ask for it in writing and itemised, with photographs. An assessment that exists only as an opinion expressed in your driveway is not usable later.

If the claim is denied

A denial has to be in writing and it has to give reasons, usually citing the specific policy provision relied on. That letter is the most useful thing in the file, because it tells you exactly what has to be answered. Read it against your policy and identify which of three things has happened: the insurer does not accept the damage exists, does not accept the cause is covered, or does not accept the amount.

Those are three different problems with three different answers, and treating a denial as one undifferentiated "no" is why so many are never successfully challenged.

In short

Document first, make it safe second, report third, and get the scope in writing before anybody starts work. In that order it usually goes smoothly. In any other order it usually does not.